A woman I'm working with has taken the bar exam five times.
She does not say, “I failed.”
She says, “I didn’t pass.”
That distinction is important.
One sounds like something that happened.
The other can start to sound like something you are.
This woman is anything but a failure.
She's intelligent.
She has a strong work ethic.
She's serious.
She's disciplined.
She's living with her husband in a 600-square-foot, two-bedroom house with one bathroom. At one point, when the kids were growing up, to give them separate rooms, she and her husband moved their own bedroom into the living room.
She's been studying for the bar exam there.
Trying to think there.
Trying to become someone new there.
And under that much pressure, her instinct has not been to reach for more company.
It's been to get away.
Maybe she needs to rent a room somewhere.
Maybe she needs to live, work, breathe, and study all alone for a while.
Maybe she needs to go completely inward.
Maybe succeeding requires becoming entirely selfish.
I keep thinking about that last one.
Because I understand why she craves solitude.
She needs fewer demands. Fewer interruptions. Fewer people needing things from her while she tries to hold onto a difficult thought.
Nothing about that seems unreasonable.
What caught my attention was that she was treating being alone as the solution.
And I understood why.
She needed space. She needed fewer demands. She needed some uninterrupted time to think.
But there is a difference between choosing solitude because it gives you something you need and withdrawing because you have decided you have to handle the whole thing yourself.
From the outside, those can look almost identical.
Inside, they are very different.
Solitude can restore us.
Isolation can leave us alone with a story that gets harder to challenge.
She was reaching for relief.
But the version of relief she could imagine was more separation from the people who might actually have helped make the work bearable.
Sometimes we don't reach for what helps.
We reach for what resembles help.
Some problems are not hard.
They are lonely.
It would be easy to call what was happening procrastination.
Or perfectionism.
Or avoidance.
Or fear of failure.
Maybe some of those things were there.
But when she described what it actually felt like, what stood out to me was how alone the task had become.
She knew what to do.
There was a website. There were prompts. There was paper and a pen. There was even a mentor willing to review what she wrote.
And still, she couldn't make herself begin.
That interested me.
Because somewhere along the way, the work had stopped being simply the work.
The essay wasn't just an essay anymore.
It was evidence.
The practice test wasn't just practice.
It was evidence.
Evidence that she had waited too long.
That she should be further along.
That maybe she wasn't disciplined enough.
That maybe she wasn't who she should have been by now.
Once that happens, beginning gets much harder.
You are no longer just asking yourself to write.
You are asking yourself to walk toward a conclusion about yourself that you already fear is true.
Of course you hesitate.
And then the hesitation becomes more evidence.
That is one of the ways shame works.
It doesn't just make you feel bad.
It changes what the task means.
At one point I asked her what she would say to someone else in exactly her position.
She didn't hesitate.
“Let's do it together.”
Not, “You need more grit.”
Not, “You need to push through.”
Not, “You need better self-talk.”
Let's do it together.
Let's pull up a question.
Let's spend fifteen minutes.
Let's see what comes.
That was the part I wanted her to notice.
She already knew how to offer the kind of support she needed.
She would give it freely to someone else.
She was having trouble giving herself permission to need it.
And maybe that is part of what we get wrong about discipline.
Sometimes the missing ingredient isn't more pressure.
It's company.
We are taught to admire people who handle things themselves.
Handle it.
Figure it out.
Don't bother anyone.
Don't show unfinished work.
Don't ask too early.
Don't need too much.
There is a version of adulthood built around never being seen in the middle of something.
You can look capable for a very long time that way.
But I have become less interested in whether someone can do everything alone.
I'm more interested in what happens when they don't have to.
I see versions of this everywhere.
The student who can talk brilliantly about the material but can't begin the paper alone.
The job seeker who can have the first conversation easily and then stalls on the follow-up.
The person who can manage everyone else's crisis and freezes at the first administrative step in her own life.
The person who looks unmotivated until someone sits beside her, and suddenly the task is possible.
We often call these discipline problems.
Sometimes they are.
But sometimes the person is trying to do something difficult under conditions that make it harder than it needs to be.
No witness.
No collaboration.
No one nearby to help keep the thing in proportion.
Just the self, facing the self, trying to manufacture movement through force.
That's a hard way to work.
The company doesn't have to look a certain way.
A husband asking bar questions while the dishes get done.
A friend staying on the phone while the email gets sent.
A mentor reading the unfinished version instead of waiting for the polished one.
A coach staying in the room long enough for the person to stop treating the task as evidence against herself.
Even speaking your thoughts into a recorder can help if writing alone makes you freeze.
The point isn't to find the perfect form of support.
It's to stop treating support as evidence that you should have been able to do it yourself.
And not everyone has another person available.
So sometimes the work is learning how to become better company for yourself.
Not with affirmations.
Not by telling yourself everything is fine.
And not by replacing one demanding voice with a slightly nicer demanding voice.
I mean something simpler.
A part of you that can say:
Let's do this together.
Let's just look at the first question.
Let's write one sentence.
Let's see what happens.
There is a big difference between an inner voice that monitors you and one that stays with you.
One asks, “Why aren't you doing this?”
The other says, “Okay. We're here. What's the next thing?”
That difference can be enough to change how a task feels.
The task may still be hard.
But you are no longer facing it as if you are on trial.
I don't mean that every difficult task is secretly a loneliness problem.
Some things are genuinely difficult.
They require skill, repetition, stamina, frustration tolerance, and time.
Sometimes we need to get better at something.
Sometimes we need to work harder.
Sometimes we need to do the thing we don't want to do.
But I wonder how often we mislabel the difficulty.
We say, “I can't make myself do it.”
And maybe the more useful question is:
What would make this easier to begin?
If you had to carry a couch up a flight of stairs by yourself, we wouldn't automatically conclude that you were weak because you couldn't do it.
We'd probably say you needed another set of hands.
But when the load is intellectual, emotional, creative, or bureaucratic, we tend to make the need for another set of hands mean something about us.
As if needing company means we aren't capable.
Maybe it means we understand something about how people work.
So I'm more interested in different questions now.
Not:
Why can't I do this?
Not:
What's wrong with me?
Not:
Why am I making such a big deal out of something so small?
But:
What part of this am I carrying alone?
What changes if someone comes closer?
Where have I confused privacy with strength?
What kind of support would make the next step proportionate again?
And if no one is available right now:
What kind of internal company do I need in order to begin?
Those questions don't remove the work.
They don't erase consequences or make difficult things easy.
They simply stop assuming that the isolated self is the only self capable of getting something done.
And sometimes that is where the movement begins.
Not with more discipline.
Not with more shame.
Just with no longer having to face the thing alone.
Some problems are not hard.
They are lonely.
0 comments