I used to begin my coaching sessions with a simple question.
And I noticed something unexpected in how people answered it.
What has gone well since we last met?
It sounds disarmingly light. Almost incidental.
But over time, I began to notice something consistent.
For some people, this question created resistance.
Not because nothing had gone well.
But because it required a different kind of attention than most people are practiced in.
A way of seeing that does not begin with the problem.
And I would often hear, just beneath the surface:
We don’t have time to focus on what is going well—we need to fix what isn’t.
As if attention given to stability
is attention taken away from repair.
As if noticing what is already working
is a delay rather than a foundation.
And over time, something became clear:
nothing could be further from the truth.
Because what changes in those moments is not the content of attention—
it is the direction of perception itself.
What we call “what is going right” is not supplementary.
It is structural.
It is already doing work
in the background of everything else.
And when it is not seen, problem-solving becomes harder, not easier.
Because you cannot stabilize what you do not recognize as already stabilizing you.
Most things we long for do not arrive the way we expect them to.
We imagine arrival as a moment we will recognize instantly—clean, unmistakable, final.
A moment that changes everything at once.
So we keep watching for it.
We look toward the horizon
for the version of life
that will finally feel like arrival.
And while we are watching,
life slips in through a side door—
wearing ordinary clothes.
We are far better at recognizing absence than presence.
Absence is easy to see. It has shape. It has urgency.
Presence does not.
Presence becomes ordinary.
It shows up as:
the quiet evening that feels like nothing in particular
the friend who always replies
the work that once felt impossible
the relationship that became familiar
We notice the empty chair.
We rarely notice the full table.
This is not a failure of gratitude.
It is a failure of perception.
This creates a quiet distortion.
We begin to assume that what matters most
should feel like arrival.
But almost nothing meaningful arrives in a finished form.
A marriage is not finished when it begins.
A calling is not finished when it becomes visible.
A community is not finished when people start showing up.
A life is not finished when it begins to feel like your own.
And yet we keep treating the unfinished
as though it were absent.
Because we mistake what is still forming
for what is not yet real.
In coaching, this becomes very visible.
When I ask, what has gone well since we last met, I am not asking for positivity.
I am asking something more precise:
What is already holding you
that you are not currently seeing?
What is already working
that your attention has moved past?
What is already stable
without having been recognized as such?
At first, there is often resistance.
Not disagreement—something subtler.
A narrowing of focus.
A return to the problem.
Because the mind is trained to equate usefulness with repair.
And repair assumes the problem is the most important thing in the room.
But something shifts when we stay with the question.
Not dramatically.
Precisely.
Attention shifts.
And what was already there
begins to become visible.
Over time, I began to notice this pattern not only in sessions.
But in life itself.
There is a role I have loved more than almost any other—the one children in my life named for me, somewhere between Trusted Adult and Fairy Godmother.
At first, I thought of it as something I did alongside real work.
A set of gestures. A relational offering. A kind of usefulness.
But over time, something shifted.
I began to realize I had not recognized its centrality
because it did not look like
what I assumed
centrality would look like.
Because it appeared in ordinary forms:
A grocery bag prepared for a hard week.
Traditions no one formally requested
but everyone came to rely on.
Tables that filled without ceremony.
Small, consistent acts that held everything together
without ever announcing themselves as structure.
What unsettled me was not their simplicity.
It was their invisibility.
That I had not recognized them as central while I was inside them.
That I was not building a life around them.
I was already living one.
A quiet evening walk that feels like nothing in particular.
You run into the neighbors.
Their dog greets you as if you are already part of something familiar.
Somewhere down the street, you can hear baby owls nesting in the palm tree on the corner of Mulberry and Lancaster.
The sound is faint. Almost missed.
And yet it is there.
The neighborhood moves in its ordinary rhythm—people returning, drifting, arriving without announcement.
You only notice it fully as you are coming back.
Not something added to the moment.
Something you were already inside of.
And for a brief second, something becomes clear—not as a thought, but as recognition—
nothing here is unfamiliar.
Only previously unrecognized.
This is where recognition becomes difficult.
Meaning does not arrive as meaning.
It arrives as repetition.
As ordinariness.
As something still unfolding.
We do not fail to receive our lives.
We fail to recognize their arrival
while they are still happening.
And this is the pattern that repeats:
what is most present
is often least perceived.
Grief makes this impossible to ignore.
When someone we love dies, nothing about the relationship becomes more real than it already was.
But everything becomes more visible.
We suddenly see what was always there:
the texture of ordinary conversations
the repetition of shared rituals
the Tuesdays that never felt like anything at all
Grief does not add meaning.
It reveals what meaning we could not previously see.
But we do not need loss to learn this.
We can practice recognition while everything is still intact.
We can learn to see what is already here
without requiring it to disappear first.
This requires restraint.
Because the instinct, when something feels incomplete, is to add.
More effort.
More clarity.
More achievement.
More certainty.
But the more difficult question is not what is missing.
It is whether anything is missing at all.
Or whether we are simply failing to recognize what is already present—
still unfolding, still becoming legible in real time.
The life we long for rarely arrives after longing ends.
It arrives while longing is still active.
And because longing does not stop immediately,
we mistake arrival for delay.
We assume the unfinished cannot count.
We assume the ongoing is not yet real.
But the ongoing is often the only thing that is real.
A relationship still being worked out is not a relationship that has not arrived.
A practice still being refined is not a practice that is missing.
A life still becoming is not a life that has not begun.
The question is not whether we have arrived.
It is whether we have learned to recognize arrival
without requiring it to announce itself.
Because what is here does not always arrive as clarity.
It becomes real through attention.
And attention, when practiced, becomes recognition.
What this comes down to
What we call “not yet” is often not absence.
It is unrecognized presence.
A life still unfolding.
Still stabilizing itself.
Still quietly becoming visible
under attention we have not yet learned how to give it.
We are not usually waiting for our lives to arrive.
We are learning how to recognize
that they already have.
And most of the work, in the end, is not addition.
It is attention.
0 comments